United state ip dating site Uncensored chat forums
Some high-profile cases are Napster, Wikileaks, Pirate Bay, and Mega Upload.
With a few exceptions, the free speech provisions of the First Amendment bar federal, state, and local governments from directly censoring the Internet.
Since that time, several legislative attempts at creating a mandatory system of content controls in the United States have failed to produce a comprehensive solution for those pushing for tighter controls.
At the same time, the legislative attempts to control the distribution of socially objectionable material on the Internet in the United States have given rise to a robust system that limits liability over content for Internet intermediaries such as Internet service providers (ISPs) and content hosting companies.
Reliable intellectual property (IP) statistics are an important tool in understanding trends in policy, business, and technology worldwide.
We cooperate with IP offices from around the world to provide the most up-to-date global IP data.
Proponents of protecting intellectual property online in the United States have been much more successful, producing a system to remove infringing materials that many feel errs on the side of inhibiting legally protected speech.
The US practices forceful seizures of domains and computers, at times without notification, causing the websites to be unable to continue operating.
However, the government has been able to exert pressure indirectly where it cannot directly censor.
The primary exception has to do with obscenity, including child pornography, which does not enjoy First Amendment protection.
is a separate portion of the CDA that remains in effect.
The bill was controversial because, according to its critics, it would limit access to a wide range of websites, including many with harmless and educational material.
The Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act was introduced in 2010, but did not become law.